362
results for "nofollow"
-
nofollow, when Google et al pitched it, was supposed to be *only* for *links* in *comments* on people's posts, not the posts themselves
tantek
at
2016-09-13 23:37
-
and certainly if you were using your own domain, I’d suggest that nofollow never be used
[benatwork]
at
2016-09-13 23:37
-
In the hypothetical situation where I would lead the openness team and be working on web distribution for such a site, I would be vehemently opposed to nofollow
[benatwork]
at
2016-09-13 23:35
-
seems to be a common silo anti-pattern, assume all users are guilty as spammers unless otherwise proven, and put rel=nofollow on their outbound links
tantek
at
2016-09-13 23:34
-
benatwork PLEASE don't abuse rel=nofollow on those rel=me links if you can
tantek
at
2016-09-13 23:33
-
Just double-checked and mine won't accept a nofollow link as a vouch either.
gRegorLove
at
2016-09-13 02:59
-
tantek was making that case i believe yes. rel=nofollow has been pretty much pointless in practice
ben_thatmustbeme
at
2016-09-13 02:58
-
I seem to recall tantek making a case against using nofollow on links, but I don't remember exactly what they were.
gRegorLove
at
2016-09-13 02:53
-
yeah because I think the current protocols are not that far from something really cool, we just need to piece it all together, and make everything very explicit (like this nofollow thing for instance which should be a big warning sign :D)
cmal
at
2016-09-13 02:50
-
i tag them all rel=nofollow
ben_thatmustbeme
at
2016-09-13 02:47