""a"" search results - search chat.indieweb.org

400642 results for ""a""

wikify << to-do: need a policy on SHOULD NOT add links which don't actually contribute anything positive to indieweb practices or sources of joy on articles about positive indieweb expressions and sources of joy (in contrast to articles about [[silos]] which criticism helps people avoid, or bad practices like [[antipatterns]], or harmful / exploitative technologies such as [[cryptocurrency]], documented to help community members
[tantek] at 2026-10-21 07:24
ok, I added "to-do: need policy on article responses, e.g. inline commentary/response/criticism of a linked article on wiki, of which we have many, on many pages, where a faulty article was linked on the wiki, and underneath it, community members have explicitly noted the faults in the article. Many "Criticism" sections contain such article links and inline responses for example." to the "See Also" section of /wikifying https://indieweb.org/wiki/index.php?diff=114274&oldid=114018
Loqi at 2026-10-21 07:22
wikify << to-do: need policy on article responses, e.g. inline commentary/response/criticism of a linked article on wiki, of which we have many, on many pages, where a faulty article was linked on the wiki, and underneath it, community members have explicitly noted the faults in the article. Many "Criticism" sections contain such article links and inline responses for example.
[tantek] at 2026-10-21 07:22
They don’t say that. They say “wiki standards” on a page about “content are relevant to the IndieWeb wiki.”
[capjamesg] at 2026-10-21 07:16
I said to put it there as a brainstorm for a general, wiki-wide policy, not as a place to discuss this specific issue.
[capjamesg] at 2026-10-21 07:14
putting on a page unrelated to the reason it was removed is not a positive move
[tantek] at 2026-10-21 07:13
I suggested that we open this discussion positively so that we have a place we can point people to say “here’s our policy on relevant links.”
[capjamesg] at 2026-10-21 07:13
from /nostalgia edit history: "need a policy on adding links which don't actually contribute anything positive to indieweb practices or sources of joy" <-- note not having to do with "indieweb relevance"
[tantek] at 2026-10-21 07:12
At this point I don't think they are acting in good faith, by misrepresenting an edit summary that is clear for anyone to look up on the history of a page
[tantek] at 2026-10-21 07:10
So that's a misrepresentation of why their link was removed. See the edit message. The problems with the link go beyond anything to do with IndieWeb relevance
[tantek] at 2026-10-21 07:09

Sort by:

Relevance Date

Filter results by:

Tag

Query took 0.01s.

Search tips

Exclusion: +foo -bar
Logical OR: foo OR bar
Exact phrase: "foo bar"
Partial words: foo*
Particular fields only: title:foo; domain:example.org; nick:somebody; after:2016-11-23; before:2016-11-23; date:2016-11-23