364
results for "nofollow"
-
and then any comments on posts are rel=nofollow
ben_thatmustbeme
at
2017-06-28 20:32
-
My vouch endpoint will ignore links that have rel="nofollow". Most comment forms on traditional websites add that to user posted links, so you can’t post your link to a trusted website and then trick my endpoint
Zegnat
at
2017-06-28 20:32
-
snarfed, i don't allow rel=nofollow links to work
ben_thatmustbeme
at
2017-06-28 20:32
-
tantek: I would expect publishers to abuse the boolean. there is no way to prevent that from happening. I hope I'm wrong, but the rel-nofollow experience says publishers will abuse it, users be damned
puckipedia
at
2017-06-28 18:01
-
tantek: service providers put rel nofollow on second-party content. this is on all silos, large social media. all links you place will be rel-nofollow. and they don't take responsibility to remove spammers. it's effectively broken link weighting
puckipedia
at
2017-06-28 17:59
-
t: ajordan summarised the problem was rel-nofollow, with the express purpose of placing on links of *third-party* content. people commenting on a blogpost hosted by a service provider. as deterrant for spam links
puckipedia
at
2017-06-28 17:58
-
rel-nofollow
ajordan
at
2017-06-28 17:56
-
we know from the debacle of rel-nofollow (another negative boolean as it were) that hosting providers are not to be trusted with negative annotations, and will inevitably abuse them for their own (perceived benefit) and claim they "have no choice" or "have to for SEO reasons", or "have to because spammers" or some other such claptrap
tantek
at
2017-06-28 17:55
-
nofollow per wikipedia: "...to instruct some search engines that the hyperlink should not influence the ranking of the link's target in the search engine's index"
j12t
at
2017-06-27 19:01
-
ben_thatmustbeme and my vouch implementations ignore links with nofollow
gRegorLove
at
2017-06-27 19:01