357 results for "nofollow"

  • test:rel-nofollow (another
    ajordan at 2017-07-01 02:50
  • yes, i understand the value of nofollow. my question is about source vs u-url, which seems unrelated :P
    snarfed at 2017-06-28 20:35
  • nofollow seems unrelated. this is about checking a link path from target => vouch => source vs target => vouch => u-url
    snarfed at 2017-06-28 20:32
  • and then any comments on posts are rel=nofollow
    ben_thatmustbeme at 2017-06-28 20:32
  • My vouch endpoint will ignore links that have rel="nofollow". Most comment forms on traditional websites add that to user posted links, so you can’t post your link to a trusted website and then trick my endpoint
    Zegnat at 2017-06-28 20:32
  • snarfed, i don't allow rel=nofollow links to work
    ben_thatmustbeme at 2017-06-28 20:32
  • tantek: I would expect publishers to abuse the boolean. there is no way to prevent that from happening. I hope I'm wrong, but the rel-nofollow experience says publishers will abuse it, users be damned
    puckipedia at 2017-06-28 18:01
  • tantek: service providers put rel nofollow on second-party content. this is on all silos, large social media. all links you place will be rel-nofollow. and they don't take responsibility to remove spammers. it's effectively broken link weighting
    puckipedia at 2017-06-28 17:59
  • t: ajordan summarised the problem was rel-nofollow, with the express purpose of placing on links of *third-party* content. people commenting on a blogpost hosted by a service provider. as deterrant for spam links
    puckipedia at 2017-06-28 17:58
  • rel-nofollow
    ajordan at 2017-06-28 17:56
Sort by:

Filter results by:

Tag

Query took 0.01s.


Search tips

Exclusion
+foo -bar
Logical OR
foo OR bar
Exact phrase
"foo bar"
Partial words
foo*
Particular fields only
title:foo
domain:example.org
nick:somebody
after:2016-11-23
before:2016-11-23
date:2016-11-23