357
results for "nofollow"
-
test:rel-nofollow (another
ajordan
at
2017-07-01 02:50
-
yes, i understand the value of nofollow. my question is about source vs u-url, which seems unrelated :P
snarfed
at
2017-06-28 20:35
-
nofollow seems unrelated. this is about checking a link path from target => vouch => source vs target => vouch => u-url
snarfed
at
2017-06-28 20:32
-
and then any comments on posts are rel=nofollow
ben_thatmustbeme
at
2017-06-28 20:32
-
My vouch endpoint will ignore links that have rel="nofollow". Most comment forms on traditional websites add that to user posted links, so you can’t post your link to a trusted website and then trick my endpoint
Zegnat
at
2017-06-28 20:32
-
snarfed, i don't allow rel=nofollow links to work
ben_thatmustbeme
at
2017-06-28 20:32
-
tantek: I would expect publishers to abuse the boolean. there is no way to prevent that from happening. I hope I'm wrong, but the rel-nofollow experience says publishers will abuse it, users be damned
puckipedia
at
2017-06-28 18:01
-
tantek: service providers put rel nofollow on second-party content. this is on all silos, large social media. all links you place will be rel-nofollow. and they don't take responsibility to remove spammers. it's effectively broken link weighting
puckipedia
at
2017-06-28 17:59
-
t: ajordan summarised the problem was rel-nofollow, with the express purpose of placing on links of *third-party* content. people commenting on a blogpost hosted by a service provider. as deterrant for spam links
puckipedia
at
2017-06-28 17:58
-
rel-nofollow
ajordan
at
2017-06-28 17:56