384961
results for ""a""
-
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1520340.1520623 mentions co-blogging in the context of "where students co-blog vis-à-vis a wiki." 🙃
capjamesg
at
2025-12-22 20:21
-
Okay I have made a few changes. Feel free to add more examples if you have seen them in the past!
capjamesg
at
2025-12-22 20:18
-
In any case I'm glad to know that there is a longer history of this, which we should certainly document!
capjamesg
at
2025-12-22 20:13
-
Yeah I think it's _really_ important from a community perspective for contributions to be first welcomed, then given feedback on (unless, of course, the contribution is spam / not in good faith).
capjamesg
at
2025-12-22 20:11
-
I think it's worth documenting that co-blogging paper on the wiki. I don't think we should rename the page to "co-blogging" though; it feels a tad distant (like co-coding or co-baking, I'd rather say pair coding or baking together)?
capjamesg
at
2025-12-22 20:10
-
so easy to misread candor as a tone mismatch
[Al_Abut]
at
2025-12-22 20:09
-
it’s somewhere on the spectrum between a citation and actually writing together
[Al_Abut]
at
2025-12-22 20:07
-
I’ve done it a handful of times where I’ve shared a google doc and collected comments on a draft
[Al_Abut]
at
2025-12-22 20:07
-
e.g. if someone wrote a paper on "blurry painting" as a thing and then someone else said wait wasn't that a thing in the past? And someone else pointed out Impressionism. Does that make the original paper less fun?
[tantek]
at
2025-12-22 20:07
-
That’s pretty close, feels more like a citation than acknowledging co-participation in creating the document in the first place though, know what I mean?
[Al_Abut]
at
2025-12-22 20:07
Sort by:
Filter results by:
Tag
Query took 0.03s.
Search tips
- Exclusion
- +foo -bar
- Logical OR
- foo OR bar
- Exact phrase
- "foo bar"
- Partial words
- foo*
- Particular fields only
- title:foo
- domain:example.org
- nick:somebody
- after:2016-11-23
- before:2016-11-23
- date:2016-11-23